“Painting the Modern Garden – Monet to Matisse”, at the Royal Academy

The exhibition, “Painting the Modern Garden – Monet to Matisse” at the Royal Academy, has just closed. I went a couple of times, and what a wonderful collection! This was art at it’s most appealing: you want stunning scenery, you want flowers, you want vivid colours, you want beautiful people, you’ve got it! You’d like to have that one on your wall? Doesn’t everyone? So art for today’s art-loving masses, me included. A roaring success.

painting-modern-garden-new-lead-large_trans++7arnwk4aCQlFbdfceVh_Wo7tw0H4YY6R2zlSOf3bCMg

Monet’s “Lady in the Garden”, 1867

f9aee3eccff4f9549cd3c1ef9e0cf53d

Matisse’s “Palm Leaf, Tangier” 1912

But does that make it bland, safe? Does being easy on the eye disqualify a work of art from being radical, challenging? I would say no. Especially when you put the art on display into historical context. At the heart of the show is Impressionism, with Monet to the fore. Pissarro, Cezanne, Renoir, Degas and others in support, as well as a number of great 20th century artists. And Impressionism has so captured the public taste in recent decades that it seems the safe bet, always. But think how adventurous it was at the time, how it shifted art from mostly recognisable representations of images and scenes (with notable exceptions like Turner in his later years) to representations of the mind’s eye, what was going on in the artist’s head. Picasso, the Cubists, Expressionists and any number of ists then took it all even further. But the Impressionists started it. Think of the brush strokes, the colour combinations, the sheer imagination. Impressionism attracted a lot of opposition from critics when the artists associated with it started their experiments. New ideas and approaches always do. But they won and they are still winning.

What of the exhibition itself? Well, I found it a delight from start to finish. Monet was its anchor. From the early paintings – people in gardens essentially – to the the extraordinary portrayals of his garden in Giverny, with the Japanese footbridge the centrepiece, to, at the end of course, some of the monster canvasses depicting those abstract water lilies. Monumental! I loved the use of light in some of the more conventional garden paintings. “Lady in the Garden” from 1867, was a striking example. The lawn and the lady positively seemed to glow.

As for those Japanese footbridges, some of the renditions went wild with colour. Monet was inspired by Japanese artists like Utugawa Hiroshige, a few of whose prints were shown in the exhibition.

For me, one of the stars of the early part of the exhibition was Pissarro. He’s known best for his “Pointillist” art – using tiny brush strokes, dots, to conjure up the image. But some of his earlier work was more traditional and really brought out the essential Frenchness of the landscape. I liked “Kitchen Gardens at L’Hermitage, Pointoise”. I’d have that on my wall! I loved one of the quotes the RA had found about Pissarro too. It began by mocking him for his deplorable fondness for market gardens before dismissing him as an impressionist market gardener specialising in cabbages. Only a French critic…

Pissarro was unrepentant. He wrote to Monet, I love compost like one loves a woman…

The middle phase of the exhibition brought some relatively unfamiliar artists to my attention. Notably three Spanish artists, Joaquin Sorolla, Joaquin Miry Trinxet and Santiago Rusinol. The colours were vivid, exuberant, reflecting their Mediterranean roots. Rich pinks, ochres, oranges, greens. Life itself.

I loved Max Liebermann’s updated Impressionist take on scenes from the shores of Lake Wannsee, just outside Berlin, too. And a one off from a British artist, Alfred Parsons, who depicted a garden, entitled “Orange Lilies”, in Broadway, Worcestershire, a place I know and love from having visited it on numerous occasions for get-togethers with friends over the years. Could that garden, painted in 1911, have been where we stayed?

The latter part of the exhibition gave us artists like Matisse, Kadinsky and Munch diverting from their usual preoccupations to celebrate the glories of the garden. Again with exuberant flourishes. No need to pretend – just celebrate colour and beauty… nature. I loved the way, though, that Munch managed to remain discombobulating.  Or should I say scary?

There was a room of photos of many of the great artists that featured in the exhibition, just before Monet’s waterlily denouement. And did they look like artists? Oh yes!

There’s a wonderful quote from Monet too, which sums it all up really. During the First World War, that horrific slaughter which came close to where he lived and worked – and his beloved garden. It’s a good way to end this piece.

As for me, I’m staying here all the same, and if those savages must kill me, it will be in the middle of my canvasses, in front of all my life’s work.

He and his art survived. And we still wonder at the splendour of it.

Art is eternal.

https://www.royalacademy.org.uk/exhibition/painting-modern-garden-monet-matisse

 

About John S

I'm blogging about the things I love outside work: music, sport, culture, London, with some photos to illustrate aspects of our wonderful city. And anything else that I happen to think is worth writing about!
This entry was posted in Art, books, theatre, cinema, London and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to “Painting the Modern Garden – Monet to Matisse”, at the Royal Academy

  1. dc says:

    Yeah but were West Ham robbed at Leicester? Your readers deserve to be told (both of us).

  2. Resa says:

    Lucky you to have seen this! Art is eternal.

    • John S says:

      We are very lucky in London, culturally. There is so much we can experience. There’s nowhere better.

      • Resa says:

        So far so good with your book! Even the Introduction is neat. I’m not too, far in, and I took a job in Ottawa for 2 months. I will resume when I return home. It will be a nice summer read. The best thing is that it’s the kind of book one can pick back up at any time!
        The font size is a tad small, but I got my glasses updated. I’ve a new prescription & progressive lenses, so reading is easier all around!

      • John S says:

        Look forward to your comments. The font is 10 point, mainly so I could limit the number of pages as I was paying for it but not charging for it. I agree it’s a bit small. The commercial version will be 11 point, which is standard size, but it adds another 100 or so pages to the book.

        Good luck with the job in Ottowa.

  3. Dood says:

    Nice to see Resa occupying a far higher plane. Please don’t sully this blog with whiny West Ham comments. Billy Bonds would never have whinged about bad luck.

    I saw the garden show at the RA early on. It was rammed with genteel invaders from the ‘burbs (a colleague called it “a rock festival for old people”), but I very much enjoyed it. Found the first few rooms very conventional, and a little tame, but I did like the way the tone of the show became more charged – with light, abstraction, vivid colour, movement – as we progressed. (And I really loved those Spanish works, which were new to me.)

    The Monet rooms at the end were magnificent (and I like your tribute to him). A great coda to a memorable show. (Monet, not your tribute.)

    P.S. Please don’t fall into the trap of comparing Leicester to Forest. We await those two Champions League titles with interest.

  4. John S says:

    The Big Man asked the footie question! I like to give answers. I think you’re harsh on the early rooms. Familiar yes, tame, no. But yeah, it got more exciting as it went on.

    Forest/ Leicester. What is it about the East Midlands that bucks the trends so radically once in a while?

  5. Dood says:

    I know, but you should beware the Big Man. He likes a wind-up.

    Indeed, the East Midlands seems to emerge from obscurity once every forty years. (Derby barely – but they did win the League in ’75, as you know.)

    Burton Albion’s turn next! They’re a breath away from the Championship, which is great news. Young Nigel’s back at the helm, and I’d love it if he could take them up. I bet seven years ago, as a non-league side, they didn’t think they’d be competing with Aston Villa..

    Oh yes, the garden exhibition. All good, very good – just liked the later stuff more.

    • John S says:

      Well, today is the day Leicester could seal the title. I’ll be rooting for them, not least so they humiliate Man U at Old Trafford and keep the Irons fifth!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s