The Scotland Referendum – are we family?

This Thursday, 18 September 2014, the Scottish people (or, more precisely, the people registered to vote in Scotland) have the chance, in a referendum, to take Scotland out of the United Kingdom. While most polls have the “No” vote in the lead, there are a lot of don’t knows, so it looks like it’s going down to the wire.

My view, as a London-based Englishman who always identifies as British on forms – partly, but not only, because my mother is Northern Irish – is that I will respect the Scottish people’s decision on what they want to do. The sensible, low risk, thing to do is stay in the Union. But the exciting, once in a lifetime opportunity, is to gain political control of one’s own country. To escape from the rule from Westminster, often by political parties which have little support in Scotland.

If I was Scottish, and had the vote, I think I would be tempted to vote Yes. It’s too good an opportunity to miss. Self-determination, escape from the London elite. I’d be worried about the economic consequences, but I’d shut my eyes and hope for the best, assuming that human ingenuity would solve the potential problems.

As an Englishman and Londoner, I kind of hope the Scots don’t want to leave our country. We’ve done pretty well together over the past 300 years. We’ve had a prosperous economy, a strong democracy, we’ve fought together against powerful enemies. We had an Empire too, although we accept that that isn’t necessarily something to be proud of in this day and age.

We bicker and express our opposition through sport, especially rugby, these days. But we also experience unity through sport: the 2012 Olympics, the British and Irish Lions  tour of Australia both being fantastic examples.

At the end of the day, I’d support the Scots if they want to leave, but I can’t really see the point of doing so in this modern age, where national borders have less relevance, with the internet and international capital flows.

At the same time, I must admit that the “No” campaign in Scotland has been pretty poor. It has emphasised the economic risks of leaving, but has never really made the positive case for staying in the UK.

But what is that positive case? What is so great about the UK? You know,  if I got asked that by a pro-independence Scot, I would struggle to articulate the case. I guess I would say we have done alright for the last 300 years. We have a democracy, rule of law and freedom of speech which we should treasure, but none of that is unique to the UK. We have a beautiful island and brilliant culture. We come together in times of need – those two world wars, for example. English people live in Scotland, while London is Scotland’s third biggest city.

Is that enough? Quite a lot of it looks back. Looking forward, there is nothing new to offer, whereas the independence cause clearly does offer a bright new future.

Really, what the case for staying in the UK says is we are family. Like all families we argue, fall out, get back together, carry on. It’s where we can be our natural selves. But when anyone or anything threatens us, we close ranks: we know that, ultimately, we are one.

So the question for Scotland on 18 September is, are we family?

A very big question.

About John S

I'm blogging about the things I love: music, sport, culture, London, with some photos to illustrate aspects of our wonderful city. I’ve written a novel called “The Decision”, a futuristic political thriller, and first of a trilogy. I’m also the author of a book on music since the 1970s called “ I Was There - A Musical Journey” and a volume of poetry about youth, “Growin’ Up - Snapshots/ Fragments”. All available on Amazon and Kindle.
This entry was posted in Random stuff and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to The Scotland Referendum – are we family?

  1. dc says:

    sounds like one for sister sledge.
    what happens to the union jack? it’s a pretty cool flag – do they really want to throw that away?
    personally whatever the result i think cameron has played an absolute stinker.
    agreeing to a vote where the positive sounding option YES is conceded to the other side and trying to rally people around a negative NO was a shockingly bad concession to make.
    the whole negativity of the no campaign has made it a hard thing to sell with any enthusiasm.
    i think he should have structured the voting as YES we like what we have and YES we want to stay in the UK i.e. inviting people to think his argument was positive.

    • John S says:

      I was tempted to stick a Sister Sledge video on the end! Totally agree on the impact of the YES/NO thing, but I guess the question has to be about the active decision. I wonder what that means for the future EU referendum. As for the flag, if Scotland leaves I suggest we turn the blue into green, which will give the Welsh a look in – they’ve got nothing at the moment.

  2. Osama Rahman says:

    So if they vote Yes, and then join Europe and join Schengen, they’ll have to build a wall to separate the two countries.

    Hang on, didn’t someone else do that a while back?

  3. Resa says:

    Sad…. un-needed move i think, however we have the Quebecois so I am empathetic.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s